One Model, Two Missions
AI’s dual path in commerce and national security. The same model serves the boardroom and the ops center — and so do the risks.
Forewarned is forearmed
Protective intelligenceInsider threatAI riskGeopolitics
Technology and geopolitics get argued at the policy altitude. The consequences land somewhere else — on the utility with no security staff, the facility with no threat assessment team, the organization that has to absorb a decision it had no part in making. This is analysis of the first, written from the second.
AI’s dual path in commerce and national security. The same model serves the boardroom and the ops center — and so do the risks.
The United States is building leading-edge memory on home soil. None of it arrives before the exposure it is meant to fix.
Russia, China and Iran want different things from an American election. The apparatus that used to tell the difference has been taken apart between cycles.
Iranian state media showed crowds marching through Tehran in combat uniforms. Confident governments do not stage these spectacles — failing ones do.
Nuclear technology arrived as a weapon and was later domesticated into a public good. AI is running that sequence backwards — and the arms control playbook does not transfer.
Every technology roadmap places a wager on the Taiwan Strait. The threshold that matters is not invasion — it is closure, and the cost of re-qualifying a supply base is already on the record.
I take a small number of advisory engagements with organizations working on threat management programs and infrastructure security posture — assessments, program design, and standing counsel for teams without a dedicated security executive.